Tuesday, October 19, 2021

Something Is Bothering My Soul ...

Something is bothering my soul. I began to notice it early in the pandemic; however, adequately identifying the source of my discontent became elusive. Initially, I thought it was the utter chaos of the COVID-19 pandemic. I would go into a store and see labels instructing me which direction to walk in an aisle ... I heard 'experts' on the news teaching me how to wipe down my groceries or my packages from the mail ... I saw people directing me to use only specific (and often outlying) store entrances, rather than being able to use the most accessible ones ... I would go to my physician's office and be instructed to take off my mostly-impervious cloth mask, in order to put on their cheap, loose-fitting, disposable one. It all felt like uneducated, non-scientific, illogical insanity. It felt like everyone, every company, every business, was trying to cover their butt, with little-to-no scientific reasoning behind their actions. 

Then, as the months wore on, this insanity gradually subsided and everyone moved into a more casual, sustainable approach to 'living in a pandemic.' We all mellowed, if only a little. Life has not returned to a pre-pandemic normal, but life goes on mostly uninterrupted. Most people take precautions, such as wearing a mask in public, indoor spaces (though many do not). Many have received COVID vaccinations, but many have not. Surges in COVID cases rise ... then fall ... then rise again ... then fall again. Businesses, restaurants, schools, organizations, and churches have made necessary adjustments to their operating models. And, for the most part, it's been effective. Life continues. Fewer and fewer people are dying because of this vicious virus. 

And yet ... something still bothers my soul.

It's something that has compelled me to write again in this blog. It's something that seems to have no easy solution ... no 'fix.' In the line of work that I'm in, I've had the privilege of seeing (and learning about) the wide spectrum of health, circumstances, and emotions on which people find themselves. 

What is bothering my soul is the FRAGILITY of life. 

I've long known that — while we may be loved equally before God — we are not all born with the same abilities, immunity, privileges, opportunities, and more. But this pandemic, like never before, has made explicit the wide range of health issues that dictate what a person can and cannot do in life. 

 In short, we're all more fragile than I ever thought. 

And this fragility bothers my soul deeply. Because I desperately want people to feel 'safe' in public again. I desperately want people to feel that they can sing in public, attend a concert or sporting event, walk through a mall, eat at a restaurant, etc. And ... the sobering reality is ... that many cannot. Or believe they cannot. Or don't want to take that risk right now. Or ever again.

Life has always consisted of this fragility. So what's different now? And why is it so troubling now?

I think what is now different (and troubling) is that a much larger, and more visible, range of people are feeling the necessity to take extraordinary precautions in life. And perhaps the visibility of these precautions reminds me of our human fragility. And that fragility scares me.

“ And perhaps the visibility of these precautions reminds me of our human fragility.

I believe in protecting others and myself due to a faith-motivated 'love of neighbor.' I make every reasonable attempt to live in such a way as to minimize infection (or harm of any kind) to those with whom I come into contact. But in spite of all of my efforts, my lament remains. We are all fragile. We are all in a vulnerable place because of this global pandemic. It's not over yet and may never be. And all of this frightens me, heightens my anxiety, and troubles my soul. 

My own theology ... my own faith ... tells me that life is indeed fragile. That human beings are flawed and that we also live in a flawed world where diseases, and violence, and racism, and hatred, and many other bad things, exist. I get it. I accept it. But I can still lament it. I can still hurt because of it. And even as I lament, I'll still stay the course. I will continue to live in ways that protect the well-being of others. I will care for those who become ill (vaccinated or not). I will pray. I will hope.

Monday, April 6, 2020

Holy Week During a Pandemic, and the "Not Good Things"

Most of us have never experienced anything like this coronavirus pandemic. We may not be sick, or even feel the threat of becoming ill. Still, we've been thrown (catapulted, really) into a time of new terminology and social action, all in order to protect ourselves and those with whom we may come into contact.

Online church services have become a desperately-needed outlet for community, especially as so many are isolated at home. I'm not sure I would call this a revival, but this pandemic is certainly allowing us an introspective look at our human need for both spiritual and community connectedness. And that's a good thing.

We like to find those "good things," those silver-linings, during this pandemic. Hope, in whatever form it comes, gives us an ability to endure. And yet, as we enter into Holy Week, perhaps we also need to sit with the "not good things." Like suffering ... illness ... and death. For Christians, there is always a balance to be found between the cross and the empty tomb. We have to live with death while also remembering its defeat. And now, as many states approach their COVID-19 peak, we mustn't rush too quickly past the thought, and news, of death.

In this Holy Week, and in this peak time of our national coronavirus pandemic, let us simply sit and endure the horrifying news that confronts us on the television and Internet. Because it's the same horrifying news that we often want to brush past even in approaching our Lord and Savior. To make my point, observe any annual Good Friday service attendance, compared with Easter Sunday attendance. Across states, across denominations ... we just don't like to sit with death. This Holy Week, may we sit with the "not good things" and not bypass them, for it's there that Jesus hangs and dies. It's there that, somehow, salvation waits.

Sunday, April 15, 2018

A Walking Dead Theology


AMC's controversial television show, The Walking Dead (based on the popular graphic novel), is a series worth discussing, especially within the Christian community. Sadly, this show has largely been ignored or dismissed by Christians, perhaps due to its graphic violence and mature content. In much the same way as Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ, many people cannot bring themselves to watch The Walking Dead. But like The Passion, The Walking Dead (TWD) has important theological ideas to share, even as those ideas are enveloped in graphic brutality. 

To the outside observer, TWD is just a show about zombies. But to even the most fledgling fan, it's a show about humanity. The zombies, or "walkers," simply provide a disastrous backdrop for a more important topic: the inner soul of humanity. TWD is meant to prod deep questions about human beings, such as what it is that makes people truly 'human,' how violence affects humanity, what it means to stay united in a world without law, and more. The zombies are only a vehicle to this end ... they are the apocalyptic impetus that forces humanity to examine its inmost being. In a world of utter survival, the protagonists (and antagonists) must decide what they must do to stay alive, and how (or if) to stay human in that process.

There are many themes throughout TWD that have deep, theological implications. While this blog is not meant to be exhaustive in any way, its purpose is to point to several important theological themes that have run throughout the series.



WHAT IT MEANS TO BE HUMAN
Rick Grimes, flawed leader and faithful protector

TWD has, from its first episode, wrestled with the question of what it means to be human. In a world overrun by 'the walking dead,' those who have remained alive must fight for survival. Safety is never guaranteed and trust is at a premium. Finding more people to partner with means survival, but always close at hand are the issues of power and corruption. Who makes decisions for the whole? Who can be trusted? If someone is a threat, are they to be killed or sent away to survive alone? As the series continues, the main protagonists (led by police officer Rick Grimes) find that survival means letting others into their group ... allowing trust to develop ... and fighting together to stay alive.



VIOLENCE AFFECTS HUMANITY IN NEGATIVE WAYS
Carol Peletier, moral compass and voice of reason
At times, TWD is a brutal show to watch. Zombies are killed in very graphic ways, as well as other living humans who pose a threat to the group's survival. But it's in these pull-no-punches visuals that the viewer can see humanity for what it really is: sinful. The show, as stated before, is meant to examine the inner soul of humanity. That soul, as in real life, is broken and scarred. When pushed to the edges of our common limits, humanity will react in very inhuman ways. This reality prompts the metaphoric use of the show's title: The Walking Dead. Are the zombies the "walking dead" ... or are those still alive the real "walking dead"? Robbed of what makes them human, the answer is that those still alive are the true walking dead.
The violence seen in TWD, though graphic, is also redemptive. Main characters such as Carol Peletier and Morgan Jones have displayed how killing both dead and living takes its toll, and makes a person less than human. Their hell is to live with the fact that they've had to kill to stay alive. They want a different reality, but are unable to find one. Their task now is to make the most humane choices possible in a very violent world. The violence on TWD is typically not glorified, but rather is meant to examine the harsh effects of living in a world of chaos and brokenness.



WE ARE BETTER TOGETHER
A band of brothers and sisters along a very long, hard road

Another vital theme running throughout TWD is that others make a group stronger. Early into the show, Rick, Glenn, Daryl, and the rest were resistant to let anyone else join their small group. They had finally found trust and didn't want to compromise it. However, as the group fled to an abandoned prison in season three, they found that they needed more people to help them in their quest for survival. Adversaries began to arise, and to remain closed off to outsiders was no longer an option. In our world, as in TWD, many live in suspicion of 'the other,' whether that other is a person of a different creed, race, or ethnicity. In TWD, those suspicions are amplified to highlight how truly fear-filled humanity can be. In the end, the group is better—and stronger—when they are united together.



PEACE IS THE WAY TO SURVIVAL
Carl Grimes, brave and compassionate truth-teller

(Spoiler alert) In its eight season, main character Carl Grimes dies of a zombie bite. While this kind of infection has wiped out many characters before him, Carl's death occurred because he was out in the woods attempting to help a stranger. Carl became a metaphor for the best that humanity could still be, even in an apocalyptic wasteland. Just before his death, Carl leaves notes to his father and friends, even to main antagonist Negan. These notes reveal a timeless truth: that peace is the only way forward for humanity to truly live. In essence, TWD is making the profound point that violence doesn't have to be the way humanity survives (in an apocalyptic world or in our own). It's only the chosen method, because too many have abused power and influence. As season eight closes, it's clear the deeper message is that forgiveness and peace will be the only way forward if the world is to be fair and just. Only those left alive can make the decision to choose that future.


If you haven't watched TWD before, it may or may not be your cup of tea. If you're not a fan of graphic horror films, then it's probably not for you. But just because a show can be easily dismissed doesn't mean it's void of meaningful value. For all of its violence and brutality, TWD will surely be documented as one of the great morality plays of our time, giving us much to ponder about our own broken reality.

Friday, March 23, 2018

What Happened to Sunday?

So what happened to Sunday?

As a Lutheran pastor, I often find myself in conversations revolving around this question. In essence, the question being asked is why there is a void of younger people in church on Sundays.

There's not an easy answer to this question, because young people are in churches on Sundays, though not often in the same kinds of churches as those asking this question.

A deeper, related question is this: Why are churches that have existed for more than 100 years closing their doors now (in the 2000s and 2010s)? This is the question I am wrestling with most these days.

Let me share a few observations I've come to conclude about this complex issue:
  • We live in a much different world today than in decades past. While some things never seem to change, many things have. Our world, and societal values, have shifted significantly. Religious attitudes have also changed. More and more people now claim "none" as their religious affiliation. In fact, the Pew Research Center found that, as of 2014, 23% of adults in the U.S. now describe themselves as atheists, agnostics or “nothing in particular.”1 Many adults who were raised in the Catholic, Presbyterian, Lutheran, Methodist, or Episcopal faith traditions are disaffiliating from those traditions, choosing now to claim a title of "spiritual" or simply "none" at all. Some of this disaffiliation from the church can be traced to increased skepticism in an institution that once claimed a moral authority, but has, in recent decades, been embroiled in many monetary and sexual scandals.

  •  We live in a consumer culture. Almost every city in America has a Walmart ... and a McDonalds ... and multiple grocery stores. Many have the competitors as well ... Target, Lowes, Home Depot, Big Lots, Best Buy, Panera, Applebee's, Burger King, Wendy's, Taco Bell, Aldi, Starbucks, and on and on. We have a plethora of options for our shopping and dining needs. This fact has led us to consume church in the same way. A person today can be extremely selective as to which store (online or physical) has the most options at the best prices. Churches are now selected in a similar manner. Many people want an optimal service time, a preferred musical style, a relevant and topical sermon, a coffee bar, and a great environment for children—all in one church. And most people can find this very kind of church in their city. The churches that cater to all of these preferences are the ones growing and thriving today. Older churches with less resources simply can't compete (and yes, sadly, it has become a kind of competition).

  • Sundays are now as busy as any other day of the week. This wasn't the case a couple of decades ago. Sundays were, even in the 1980s, still considered generally sacred by most people. That meant that the center of a community's activity, on Sunday, was the church. It was the place where one would go to see friends and colleagues...and to be seen by friends and colleagues. There was more of a societal expectation to attend church. Similarly, most businesses were closed on Sundays and youth sporting events were confined to weekdays and Saturdays. This is not the case today. There are many competing options for peoples' time, even on Sundays. And when a parent or grandparent has to choose between going to church or seeing their little one play soccer or baseball, guess which one wins the day?

  • There is also a generational divide that still exists, perhaps more prominently than in decades past. Blame it on a digital technology gap ... blame it on changing societal and political attitudes ... blame it on whatever. What is hard to overcome is that younger people are often attracted to different styles of church worship than their parents or grandparents. And people also tend to migrate to people within their age bracket. That means that younger people tend to go to the church with other younger people, and older people tend to go to the church with other older people. There may be nothing wrong with this generational divide, but it's a factor not to be overlooked.

I have heard and read about many mainline Protestant churches that are now closing their doors, due to a lack of persons and resources to keep their ministries going. This is often very sad. It is always hard when an institution, which has done so much good for a community, ceases to be. But behind the laments are the lingering questions of why. "Why did we have to close?" "What did we do wrong?"

The purpose of this blog is to provide some answer to those "why" questions. There are a myriad of reasons as to why a particular congregation closes, but typically these churches didn't do anything wrong. They just found themselves in the middle of a changing culture and were unable to adapt ... because adapting would have meant losing the very essence of who they were.

Is there any hope left for smaller, mainline Protestant churches?

I'm certain there is hope ... but the factors above need to be thoroughly discussed, too. Changes may need to be made. And finding a new normal, in terms of demographics and attendance expectations, will be necessary. But there is still hope—a house of worship is always a place of hope.

1 http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/09/14/the-factors-driving-the-growth-of-religious-nones-in-the-u-s/

Friday, November 10, 2017

Why Theology Matters

Certainly you've heard, or read, a statement like this:
“Well, they took God out of our schools and look around, look at what's happening...”
(See articles like http://www.forerunner.com/forerunner/X0098_Ban_on_school_prayer.html for more instances of this rhetoric.)

It's time to call this kind of language what it is: harmful. And it illustrates why theology matters.

Why is this kind of language harmful? It's not helpful, and even harmful, because it makes short-viewed assumptions ... and also makes God into an angry puppeteer whose actions are based on how good or bad all of us flawed humans behave.

My example: The recent mass shooting at First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas. You will hear no one make a similar absurd statement about the removal of God as the cause of this horrific incident. And yet, the violence and chaos of our world continues ... even in a house of Christian worship.

This is precisely why theology matters.

Theology (the study of the nature of God / how we speak about God) does matter. It matters because people are easily influenced, and statements such as the example above portray God in a misguided, harmful way. Statements such as "This is what happens when you take God out of [fill in the blank]" lead people to see God as that angry puppeteer. And, as the shooting at First Baptist Church show, these arguments don't hold up to reasoned logic.

Is God really the kind of Deity that allows shootings in schools and other places, all because prayer has become more regulated in public spaces? That's not the God I know. And I'm guessing it's not the God you know, either. May we all learn to speak of God with care and compassion, even as we question the darkness so prevalent in our world.

Sunday, August 27, 2017

Reflecting on My Journey to Ordination

It's always helpful, I think, to stop and reflect as often as possible. This is how we evaluate where we've been, what we've done, and who we've become because of it. My life has taken me many places, and today marks my first full year of ordination. That word, ordination, likely doesn't hold a lot of meaning for many people. At one time it didn't really mean anything to me. But four years of theological study, contextual-education sites, and a summer chaplaincy internship will change a person. This long, winding journey that I began almost 8 years ago has taken me from Indianapolis to Columbus, and now to New Philadelphia, Ohio. It's a journey that began with intimidating essays, evaluations, and interviews. It then took me through a seminary education, a year-long internship, and a regional placement with the Lutheran Church. Indeed, it's a journey that has forever changed me, as well as the way I view God and the world. A journey that has broken down my black-and-white perceptions, even my faith at times, only to rebuild it with a broader worldview.

Today, as I reflect on this past year and the previous ones that led to this role as pastor of Emmanuel Lutheran Church, I am both thankful and humbled. Thankful to God for the people I serve, who also serve me in more ways than can be adequately counted ... and humbled by the position to which I've been called. I spent this evening with my family as we enjoyed a picnic with some members of our church. As we ate and talked, I felt especially grateful. I thought about how much I really do love my job, which, unfortunately, is something not many people are able to claim. I thought about the honor it is to lead these people on their faith journeys, and to walk with them through the many peaks and valleys of life.

Lutherans use the word "called" to describe this unique vocation. It's meant to describe the way both God — and a denominational church body — call a person into ordained ministry. It's not a scientific formula, but it is a thorough and rigorous process. It takes a lot of personal discernment as well as a lot of discerning people who affirm a person's calling. It's been a long and sometimes difficult road for me, but also an extremely rewarding one. I never thought I would be in this position, but am very thankful to God that I am. My life, by far, isn't perfect ... but the journey has made it all worthwhile.

 "Be brave enough to travel the unknown path, and learn what you are capable of."
- Rachel Wolchin, Author


August 27, 2016 • Northeastern Ohio Synod Ordination • Zion Lutheran Church, Youngstown, Ohio

Monday, February 20, 2017

A Much-Needed "God's Not Dead" Critique


The Context
The movies God's Not Dead and God's Not Dead 2 have become very popular in the Christian culture. These films have perhaps filled a void in the Christian movie genre. This movie genre has existed for a long time, but certainly found a revival in the success of 2004's The Passion of the Christ, which set off a decade-long run of faith-based filmmaking. Other notable successes were 2005's The Chronicles of Narnia, 2006's Facing the Giants (written and produced by brothers Alex and Stephen Kendrick of Sherwood Pictures), then 2008's Fireproof and 2011's Courageous (both also written/produced by the Kendrick brothers). Many other films have been made in the past decade, but were not as successful as the Kendricks' films. So when God's Not Dead debuted in 2014, it found a familiar audience who seemed hungry for more Christian-themed movies. 

God's Not Dead was very successful, earning almost 61 million dollars in box-office revenue in the United States in 2014. The popularity of God's Not Dead sparked a sequel (God's Not Dead 2) in 2016.

The Critique
My goal in this blog entry isn't to tear down the God's Not Dead films—my goal is to offer a different, more theologically-sound perspective of them. Sadly, I think most of the Christian public simply ingest whatever the movie and Christian industry put before them. And much of it, to be blunt, is rubbish. 

While God's Not Dead and God's Not Dead 2 have redeemable qualities (messages of hope, faith, and redemption are prevalent in both movies), these films do the very thing that they feel has been done to Christianity by the culture-at-large. The whole premise of these two films is that Christianity in America is under attack. The films suggest that being an outspoken person of faith is not well-received in today's culture, and that many efforts are in place in our world to silence those who profess faith in God. And while they build their premise from documented cases of persecution against Christians in the U.S., those cases are relatively small and most never made it to court.

Both films have multiple storylines (and pop-culture cameos) occurring throughout, which is not problematic in and of itself. However, these storylines become problematic when they don't add to, or even connect to, the primary storyline. But the deeper problem of these two films is the theology. Because theology is kind of an academic, "seminary" word, it might be helpful to define it. Theology simply means "the study of God." However, in a modern context it really means the way a person, or set of persons, interpret God.

The God's Not Dead films promote a very fundamental, evangelical Christian theology. This theology would be in line with the post-Billy Graham wave of Baptist and non-denominational Christian theology that endorses a "decision-based" form of faith in God. In this version of Christianity, a person becomes saved by making a personal decision to accept Jesus Christ into one's life. And this version of Christian theology comes to the fore in these films, as they become vehicles of promoting this way of thinking. This theology is significant in the films, as in both God's Not Dead and God's Not Dead 2, when times of personal crisis arise (serious injury / mourning / family crisis), the Christian characters use these opportunities to evangelize those in crisis, rather than to simply listen or offer a word of concern.

Even with the questionable storytelling and theological issues aside, the main, blatant problem with both of these films is the straw-man argument that both present. Again, a definition here might be helpful. A straw-man is a common form of argument that gives the false impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while the opponent's argument was never made in the first place. In the context of the God's Not Dead films, the issue at stake is how the movies portray Muslims, atheists, and agnostics. They build a straw-man out of these persons, falsely stereotyping them as people who hate Christianity. While this is not only untrue, it paints a very harmful image of people that Christians are called to love. The films' premise, again, is that Christianity is under attack by everyone who is not a Christian. However, the films discharge the very same form of attack on Muslims, atheists, and agnostics (supposedly forgetting all about that "Golden Rule" passage in the Bible). These films make Christians look like cute, innocent hamsters...and non-Christians look like ravenous foxes waiting to pounce and destroy the hamsters.

A Final Word
This blog entry would never need to be written, but for the success of the God's Not Dead films. It's concerning because Christians are eating this stuff up, applauding in theaters and believing that this version of Christian theology is true and healthy. To those who read this blog, I encourage you to engage these films with a critical mind. And why? Because the point of the Christian faith is not to condemn others and to build up your own tribe (as the makers of these films would have you believe). The point of the Christian faith is to love others ... especially those who don't think or act like you do.

——


Wednesday, November 9, 2016

Words Matter

“This election has hurt people, and the pain it caused certainly does not end today. But democracy does not end today, either. We are still bound to each other. We can still hold one another accountable for making a better world. We can name our pain and demand to be treated better, because LOVE demands respect and dignity, not just a vote every now and then. Today is just the beginning of a new day, and we get to decide what that means.” - Michael Pickett, M.Div., STM

Words matter. Words both inspire and incite, and because of this, they matter. The words above, from a seminary colleague, inspire me today. They give me hope that the future of our country—and the future of my children—might be one where love and reconciliation are lifted higher than opinions and differences.

Unfortunately, there are so many words out there. And they all compete for the precious and limited time that people will give to them. Some are helpful, some are hurtful.

It is with this in mind that I find myself saying less...writing less. Because there are simply too many competing words, and not enough time in the day to read or hear them all.

So I will not write much today. It may not matter that I write anything at all. But, because words do matter, I will still write...

Let us love each other. Let us also feel some sadness when a country is divided over a presidential election. Let us feel conflicted when we speak before we listen. Then let us listen. And then, let us love, even in disagreement.

Friday, September 23, 2016

ReDefining the Church ... Again

I've long been taught that the Church is not a building ... it's the people. However, I am currently pondering if that's truly accurate. Is the Church just a body of people who follow a set of beliefs in the Triune God?

Could it be that the Church really is the building?

Hear me out ...

If the Church is the people, then it's surely a flawed bunch of persons. And by flawed, I mean that the body of Christ is often not as welcoming and loving as it should be. The radical hospitality that Jesus displayed is hard to emulate. So if the Church is the people, then it might be a bit inefficient at conveying the love and acceptance of Jesus.

If, however, the Church is a building ... more specifically a sanctuary ... then it is a sacred and safe space where one is invited, accepted, and unconditionally loved by God. It is a place that does not depend on the congregation's ability, or inability, to be hospitable.

When the Church is a truly open and safe space for everyone, then the Church is what it's meant to be. It is holy ground. A safe space of unconditional love and acceptance. An open table. It is God's house, a place where all are equal and all are loved.

I'll close with the words to "To Everyone Born, A Place At The Table":
 
For everyone born, a place at the table, 
for everyone born, clean water and bread, 
a shelter, a space, a safe place for growing, 
for everyone born, a star overhead,

For woman and man, a place at the table, 
revising the roles, deciding the share, 
with wisdom and grace, dividing the power, 
for woman and man, a system that's fair,

For just and unjust, a place at the table, 
abuser, abused, with need to forgive, 
in anger, in hurt, a mindset of mercy, 
for just and unjust, a new way to live,

And God will delight 
when we are creators of justice 
and joy, compassion and peace: 
Yes, God will delight 
when we are creators of justice, 
justice and joy! 
 
Shirley Erena Murray  Words © 1998 Hope Publishing Company  

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

Just a Piece of Cloth...

It's just a piece of cloth.

Really, that's all it is.

A Clergy Stole
But, in the Lutheran tradition of which I am a part, it holds deep meaning. Without this garment, I am not viewed as an ordained clergy person. I may be almost there, but I'm not quite there yet.

Leaders in the Lutheran Church usually wear a couple of odd pieces of clothing when they lead a worship service. First, they wear an alb. It's that white robe that most pastors and priests wear. You've seen them. They look like a big, flowing dress and are usually worn by older, white men. They look a little out of place. Ancient. Foreign.

Also worn is this thing called a stole. This is the piece of cloth I referred to moments ago. At its root, the stole is simply a garment worn over the alb to signify the status of the person wearing it. For most denominations, that means that ordained pastors are the only ones to wear the stole. Simply put: not ordained, no stole.

The stole can be practical, too. Like an alb, it helps to identify the principal leader of the service. Even for Lutherans, the alb and the stole aren't musts. They're typically just suggested apparel. Usually tradition demands they be worn. So it's a pick-your-battle kind of thing.

There is deeper meaning to these pieces of clothing, above and beyond the practical aspects they hold. The alb signifies baptism, and thereby belongs to everyone.1 The leader of the service wears it to illustrate a different way to be—a way that transcends any particular clothing style. The alb is also meant to disassociate the leader from the ways that our current clothing communicates gender, sexual attraction, class, and wealth, inviting each of us to another way of considering the human being.2 In these ways, I believe the alb can be a helpful symbol. The practical problem is that no one really thinks about those deeper meanings when they see someone wearing an alb.

The stole is a bit different in that it's reserved for those who have been ordained. Called by God. Set apart for the ministry of Word and Sacrament. Sounds so reverent, right? The stole has its origins as far back as the Roman empire and, like an alb, it is a beautiful symbol, even if it unintentionally elevates a person's status above the others around them.

Even with the problems that a stole can embody, I find myself, as a soon-to-be pastor, longing to don this symbolic garment. Weird, because I am not particularly drawn to the traditional ways of the Church. Like I said before, it's just a piece of cloth.

And yet, for me, it will mark the conclusion of a four-plus-year journey, one that has challenged me in ways I never could have expected. It will signify a time when I become something I never thought I could be. It will give affirmation to my calling, though it makes me no better than anyone else.

In its best sense, my hope is that the stole will continually remind me of the sacredness of my vocation. The trust that others have put in me. The invaluable influence I might have in others' lives. The complexity of faithfully proclaiming this odd and mysterious gospel.

When I become ordained, I won't get a ring. I won't magically become different than I am now (even with many ordained clergy hands laid on me). I won't get some miter or fancy hat. But what I will receive is the honor of wearing the stole. Just a piece of cloth. Yet so much more.

And while it is just a piece of clerical attire, I pray it lies a bit heavy around my neck, ever reminding me of its depth and purpose.

1, 2 - Brugh, Lorraine S. and Gordon W. Lathrop. The Sunday Assembly. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 2008. Print.

Thursday, February 25, 2016

The Worrisome, Over-Protective, and Emotionally Unhealthy Apostle Paul

I have noticed a troubling pattern in the life of the apostle Paul, and I'm calling it out.

Simply put, Paul is a bad example of what a minister should be.

Was he a great theologian? Sure.

A convincing rhetorician? Definitely.

I realize that it will likely be offensive for many to read, in bold print, that Paul is a "bad example" of a minister. However, to call Paul a healthy example of a minister of the Gospel is something my seminary education will not allow me to do. For this man of great faith travels around the Mediterranean, visiting fledgling churches and making new converts along the way, all the while attempting to keep them continually at his metaphoric side.

He can't seem to let them go and become grown-ups. He can't allow them to own their faith. And that simply isn't healthy.

Let's look at a few examples from his letters to various congregations.

Romans 16:19  "For while your obedience is known to all, so that I rejoice over you, I want you to be wise in what is good and guileless in what is evil."

Here Paul appears to be using a form of the rhetorical device, apophasis, whereby he commends the Roman Christians' faith and obedience, but then immediately infers that they are easily prone to temptations that could bring about their downfall. Paul wants to claim that he has full faith in these Christian believers, but he falls short of fully affirming them.

1 Corinthians 9:19; 22b  "For though I am free with respect to all, I have made myself a slave to all, so that I might win more of them."
"I have become all things to all people, that I might by all means save some."

In many of his letters, Paul shows an excessive willingness to be "all things to all people." In this pericope he also attests that he has been "entrusted with a commission" and will do whatever is needed to fulfill it (1 Cor 7:17).

2 Corinthians 12:20  "For I fear that when I come, I may find you not as I wish, and that you may find me not as you wish;"

Paul also displays strong concerns and emotions for believers to whom he has ministered. Some of these emotions, as seen above, are even fear and anxiety.

Galatians 4:19  "My little children, for whom I am again in the pain of childbirth until Christ is formed in you,"

While not needing to fully unpack this metaphor, Paul clearly sees himself as a parent to the many churches to whom he has ministered. And for Paul, he is a parent who cannot seem to let his children go off on their own. Here he also takes on the responsibility for "forming Christ" in the believers in Galatia.

Philippians 1:27  "Only, live your life in a manner worthy of the gospel of Christ, so that, whether I come and see you or am absent and hear about you, I will know that you are standing firm in one spirit, striving side by side with one mind for the faith of the gospel,"

Paul again shows a worrisome spirit for the faith and actions of others, even as he demonstrates a concern that the Philippian believers be of "one spirit" and "one mind."

In these brief examples, one can see in Paul a man who acts as an over-protective parent, pleading with his children to behave while he is away. Does that sound healthy? Indeed it sounds like the actions of an emotionally unhealthy individual who cannot trust that his children are capable of living without his assistance. Perhaps it is because Paul sees these believers as children (in terms of spiritual maturation). However, these are not children. And if Paul believes them to be spiritually immature, then another problem presents itself. Is it up to Paul—or God—to grow the faith of these believers? Can Paul, a man who is obviously in touch with his own sinfulness (see Romans 7:18), believe that the perpetual maintenance of their faith is solely in his care?

Please understand that I am not condemning the many fundamental instructions that Paul offers to these growing churches. I am simply observing in him an unhealthy need to care for people beyond his immediate reach—an unnecessary, burdening responsibility for the spiritual health of others.

Many pastors have undoubtedly—and perhaps subconsciously—imitated Paul's zeal for helping fellow believers (even to their own frustration and burnout). To be a healthy person means taking responsibility only for oneself—not for the actions or beliefs of others. Paul's example is one of laden concern to ensure the spiritual well-being of fellow believers around the Mediterranean Sea. While commendation may be made for Paul's faith and love for God's people, it cannot be made for his unhealthy sense of responsibility for those same people.

All scripture referenced from the New Revised Standard Version Bible, copyright © 1989 the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America.

Monday, October 26, 2015

A Need To Be Known (Matthew 15:21-28)

The following is a short story written from the point of view of the Canaanite/Syrophoenician woman who met Jesus in her hometown outside of Tyre and Sidon. She was the first woman given voice in the Gospels, and Jesus's initial reaction to her is surprising, if not offensive. Though this story is very brief at only eight verses in length, there is much depth, confusion, and beauty underneath its surface.


A Need To Be Known
by Scott Nellis

    Demon-ridden. It seemed much of my life could be described this way. That was now what they called my daughter. While that derisive name hurt me, it paled in comparison to the hurt I felt every day as I looked in my daughter’s eyes. Day after day her pain would tear away at my soul. I was a fragmented shard of the woman I wanted to be. For far too long my daughter and I had been looked upon differently. Mostly we were glared at. And if the response wasn’t a glare, it was because their eyes were looking away, as if to avoid even our glances touching. Often I wondered what we had done to deserve this and, more importantly, why any divine response seemed so absent.

    Life is hard when you’re a widow. Harder still to be a widow and a mother. My husband had died some months ago. He had become severely ill and was unable to recover. I had never imagined myself alone, without my husband by my side. Now I would also be the sole provider for our daughter. Life had always been hard, but my husband worked tirelessly to provide for us. Life without him would be very different. I had few skills and no family for support. This left my daughter and I alone and without any help from others in our village. After my husband died, my days became divided between washing clothes, cooking, and now selling pottery. The days were long and extremely hot. Each day I hoped for enough money to feed my daughter and maybe even myself by nightfall. At times I became so desperate that I contemplated selling my own body. The only thing that stopped me was an unexplainable sense of dignity and resiliency that seemed fastened to my heart.

    The months went by and we survived, if only scarcely. My daughter was young but faithfully sat with me every day, even through the scorching heat of the midday sun. She would never complain, even when I woke her before dawn for the long walk to get water for the day. Most days she would grind our grain, since I no longer had much time to do this. Kneading and baking clay not only took most of my time, but also my energy. My daughter and I lived in a rural area east of Tyre. Like other Phoenicians in neighboring towns, most of the food our village produced went to Tyre and also to the town of Sidon. We were a people who had few resources and even fewer rights. Any significance we might hope for was in short supply. This often angered me. It was our appointed place in society and there was nothing, sadly, that could change that.

———

    My husband and I had named our daughter Izabel. She was a blessing from our family’s gods, an answer to our prayers. Even though we were poor and of low status, we still had joy. Indeed, we had to have this joy. Life in our peasant village was demanding. My husband worked as a laborer in the wheat and barley fields. He would often have to be out in the fields for days at a time. Money and food were sparse. When we were together, we found joy in the familial things like singing songs after the evening meal or taking walks with our little girl through the worn paths surrounding our village. After my husband’s death, Izabel had to grow up so fast. This was upsetting for me because I, too, had a very abbreviated childhood. My own father had died when I was a young girl and I quickly took over many of my family’s day-to-day duties. Now my own daughter was reliving my childhood and watching it unfold was a great burden for me.

    As a child I remember that my own days were mostly spent looking after our family’s animals, carrying water from the well to our home, and helping my mother to pick fruit.1 This work was very hard, but I understood that we all had to do our part. My family was not wealthy and thus was viewed as “less worthy” than others in the village. This was our harsh reality. My mother often reminded me, “Adonia, remember who you are.” This was her way of clinging to a hope that lie just beyond our present circumstance. In our society, value was not something determined by the gods. A person’s value all posited on one’s family of origin as well as the area in which one lived. Because my family had no wealth or influence, we had few rights and were viewed as having little human value. I know this bothered my mother, which is why she taught my siblings and I to always remember that we did, indeed, have worth. Our village was a melting pot of ethnicities and religious beliefs. Greeks like my own family were often viewed with disdain by the Jewish families in our community. To add to the cultural tension, the larger cities of Tyre and Sidon required our village to provide for its food needs. Because our village was made up largely of farmland, we were expected to support the needs of those who lived in the cities. This held true even in times of poor harvests, when our own family barely had enough to eat.2 Tyre and Sidon had wealth and also power. With a heavy hand they controlled our village and others like us. Life was hard but we had faith. My mother and father taught us many worship practices. There were many gods to whom we prayed and gave offerings. We also learned about the Israelite God to whom many other villagers gave worship. My parents wanted my siblings and I to understand the value of atoning for one’s wrongdoing as well as offering thanksgiving for the gods’ blessings on our family. These teachings had a profound impact on me as a child. It was in this learning that I found a deep desire to connect with something beyond my daily existence. I longed to be known and valued beyond the limited periphery of my own home. My mother had told me to remember who I was—however, I also wanted my worth to matter to others.

———

    Izabel had not only learned to knead flour and grind grain at a young age, but had also learned the art of crafting pottery. I showed her how to dig and mold the clay, forming it into ceramic basins and bowls that could be sold to others in the village. This was our life now, strenuous as it was. Through it all, though, we held onto to our joy. When we were able, Izabel and I would take walks on those same worn paths that we took when she was a baby. We would talk about her father, about all the things we missed about him. These things were small, but they were significant. They gave us hope that everything might go well for us. Every night we would present offerings of thanksgiving, as we were grateful for another day of life. We offered the best of our grains, honey, and fruit, believing with all hope that Baal, Astarte, and the lesser gods would return this blessing to us. This, however, made it all the more heartbreaking when Izabel became ill.

    I have no explanation for what happened to Izabel. It happened rather abruptly as we sat outside in the late afternoon. Izabel was playing in the dirt when she began to shake violently. Panic set in as I immediately grabbed her and carried her inside our home. As I laid her down on my bed and held her tight, fear overwhelmed me. What was happening to my baby? I went to get my neighbor and we both prayed fervently as we tried to calm Izabel. By nightfall the violent shaking waned, but a fever persisted. I was exhausted. What started as any other day had turned into a horrific dream. Anxious thoughts swirled through my mind as I vainly attempted to ease her suffering. The following day I awoke to Izabel crying out for my help. I had fallen asleep on the ground by her side. I had no medicine to help my daughter—nor would medicine have been of any help. For not only did she have a persistent fever, she would shake uncontrollably for extended periods of time. When she did happen to stop shaking, she looked as if she had been thrown down a hill. I ached for her as only a mother could; any type of relief was nowhere to be found.

    People in my village had many thoughts about illnesses such as the one that had befallen Izabel. Most viewed the cause of these conditions as the work of demons. Others viewed it as a curse on one’s family. Whatever the cause, it was clear to me that we had fallen out of favor with the gods. Many also seemed to view my daughter’s illness this way. The gossip I heard indicated that people thought we had offended the gods. This caused me to look deep within my own heart. Had our offerings not been good enough?3 Villagers now viewed us with suspicion. Their heads would turn toward the ground as they passed by our home. I felt shunned, even by my own people. At night I sat by my daughter’s side, wondering if the people in my village were right. I must have offended the gods, but I could not think of how this occurred. Certainly I must have done something to bring this on my daughter.

   Every day brought new questions that I could not answer. Would my daughter ever recover? If Izabel did recover, would she be the same as she was before? How could I make enough to support the both of us when I had to be continually by her side? I had always believed that my offerings were pleasing to our family's gods. Why would they have let a demon overtake my beloved daughter? This continued to trouble me deeply. At this point I didn't know what to think or even what to believe. As a poor widow I had no voice in my village. No one cared about my daughter’s plight. Except for one kind neighbor, no one would stop by my house to see my daughter. The cult leaders were unable to drive out the demon in Izabel and my prayers and offerings were not sufficient. Any faith or hope that I had early on was all but gone. I knew that my daughter might die, but that was not the most difficult truth I had to accept. The most difficult truth was that I doubted my ability to care for her in this condition. I was scared and it hurt too much to see Izabel this way; I feared running away from it all, hoping that someone else might better take care of her. Acknowledging this only added guilt to my already shattered state of being.

    Izabel’s condition lingered on and on. As weeks turned into months, I became so very desperate. Whatever demonic force had overtaken my daughter was more powerful than I ever could have imagined. There was fear in her eyes and seeing it tore at my soul. Even with no faith left, I prayed and hoped. I continued to give offerings and even took my daughter to a local healing bath, waiting for some sign of help. I felt as though I needed an answer, not only for myself but also for Izabel. What had she possibly done to deserve this? My frayed heart ached as I cared for her, waiting and listening for an answer. Every night the same response came: silence.

    As the severity of Izabel’s condition heightened, I spent many hours each day pondering her fate. I shed many tears as I watched her lie in my bed, sweating and shaking. She had not eaten in days and often, when she did eat, she would vomit her food immediately. If this was to be her existence, then it was not worth it. Any expectation for Izabel’s recovery had disappeared when a ray of hope shined into our darkness by way of village rumor. My neighbor came by, as she did every few days, and told me that a healing man, Jesus the Nazarene, was in our village. She asked if I knew of him. This question seemed strange to me, as everyone seemed to know of him.

———

   The healing man. The miracle worker. The deliverer of demons. I had heard many names used to describe this man, Jesus, from the town of Nazareth. Some thought he was the son of the Israelite God, while others thought he was an impostor. Many called him a threat to the Roman rule. He was of Jewish descent and was called “rabbi” by many. Even in my rural village, far from Nazareth, most knew about this man. I had heard much about him—I knew he was a teacher and a type of prophet. I knew that many believed he was a messiah. For all that I had been told about him, I could not comprehend how a person could be both man and divine. A “son” of a god, walking among us? What I found most curious was the stories of his acts of healing. He had supposedly healed paralytics and those with demons at Capernaum and Gennesaret. If he was indeed a religious man, as many had claimed, he was certainly not a typical religious man. It was said that he had healed not only Jews but also Greeks. I found this entirely perplexing, as Greeks of Canaanite descent were viewed by Israelite Jews as a cursed people. Israel was God’s chosen people and we were not. Could this man really be healing and driving out demons from our people, too?

    Not entirely sure of what to expect, I asked my neighbor to stay with Izabel so that I might go and find this Jesus, in the hopes that he might be able to heal my daughter. This mission seemed foolish even to me, as I understood the societal rules of my village. He was a man and I was a woman with no wealth or status. He a Jewish teacher and I a Greek widow. Still, I was desperate and I would not let these rules hinder me—not today. My daughter’s life depended on me and I would do whatever I could to get help for her. There seemed to be nothing left to lose and I would not take “no” for an answer.

    I ran through my village, aware that I might have little time before Jesus moved on to another town. I was not sure what I would say to him if, in fact, I found him. I was only sure of my deep need and the possibility that he might truly have divine power to heal my Izabel. Running through the streets, I hoped to see a crowd or some other hint of this man’s location. My village was not very large, however at this time of day it was arduous to run up the stone pathways, navigating through the many people that clustered together in the center of town. The village seemed especially congested today. It felt as if each person in my path was a barrier to my daughter’s healing. I needed to find this man and yet I could hardly move through the crowd. Finally I came to a clearing and saw some Jewish men huddled around a door. I recognized this home, as it belonged to a prominent family in the village. Seeing these Jewish men was enough of a sign for me; I went up behind the men and started shouting, “Have mercy on me, Lord, Son of David!” I hoped my recognition of Jesus’s identity would gain his attention. Some of the men looked toward a man standing in the middle of the front room. This confirmed for me that I had indeed found this man, Jesus the Nazarene. “Rabbi, my daughter is tormented by a demon.” Silence. He did not even look toward me. The men who were gathered walked over and began talking with him, looking back at me as they whispered. This at least gave me a slight flicker of hope. Perhaps they would convince Jesus to help my daughter. Again he did not look at me, but instead stared at those men and said, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” My hope faded, for I understood the truth in his words. This man was a Jewish rabbi. He was not supposed to help people like me. And yet he had helped people like me.

    As discouraging as his words were, I knew I must press further. I had been through too much and so had Izabel. For her sake and for mine I would not walk away without at least some acknowledgement. While I understood the social lines drawn between people like Jesus and people like me, I had also come to believe that this man might be different. I knew that he had healed others from outside of his own people. He was said to be compassionate to all and kind toward children. Some said he did not observe the rules of his own religion and was known to help and heal even on their Sabbath. I remembered all of these things because they seemed so unusual; most cult leaders in my village would not speak to me, much less show compassion. Now I hoped that perhaps Jesus would grant his compassion to me. With all the courage I could muster, I knelt before him and said, “Lord, help me.” There was a need to show this man reverence, and still I needed to be insistent. My daughter’s life depended on me and yet I knew that, without some divine intervention, I was unable to help her at all. Astonishingly, Jesus looked at me and then said, “It is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.” Silence overtook the room as the light chatter of Jewish men came to an abrupt stop. For much of my adult life I had been treated like one of the dogs that roamed the village streets, foraging for food and attention. Now this man was assigning me this label, as if I was to forever be marked by it. It was almost more than I could bear and I felt tears welling up behind my eyes. The very thing that brought me here—willing to leave my daughter’s side—was the belief that this man’s divinity somehow extended even to my family. I now needed him to hear me and to acknowledge not only my need, but me as a person.

    I felt like breaking down and crying, right there on the dirty floor. These past few months had been so hard on Izabel and me. Our road had been long and, until today, all of my hope had faded away. As I fought back tears I looked up at Jesus and said, “Yes, Lord, yet even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters’ table.” Hearing those words come out of my mouth was surprising even to me. Timidity had typically defined my persona and now I was challenging the honor of a Jewish man. I understood that this man’s purpose was to reveal his divine identity to Israelite Jews. But from all I had learned about him, I believed that this name, “son of God”—which many had ascribed to him—was somehow meant to include all people. If I was to be compared to a dog, then could I not at least have a small portion of what he was offering to Israelite Jews? Why would he have helped other Greeks but refuse to help my daughter? After all Izabel and I had been through, I could not accept that this was to be our fate.

    His reply came almost instantly. “Woman,” he said as he looked at me empathetically, “great is your faith!” I could hardly believe what I was hearing. “Let it be done for you as you wish.” Jesus then walked by, gently placed his hand on my head, and left the house. The other men quickly followed behind and the home was empty. Still kneeling, I felt sweat roll off of my face. Still astounded by what had just occurred, I now wondered what Jesus had meant. Was he going to find my daughter and drive the demon from her? Did he need me to lead him to my home? I got up and ran out of the house, but he was nowhere in sight. Frantic, I ran back toward my home, hoping to find him there. It was quiet as I approached the house. I slowly walked through the door, nervous and apprehensive. From the back room my neighbor ran toward me. “Adonia, Adonia!,” she exclaimed. “Izabel! She is healed!” I looked at my daughter, still lying on my bed. She looked up at me and smiled as I ran over to her. I held her in my arms and promised that everything would now be all right. The demon was gone and we were free.

    I have long thought about that day. This man, Jesus, had made a profound and lasting impact on our lives. Our conversation lingers in my mind even now. Was he testing my faith in his divine ability? Was he challenging me, that I might rise above all the forces that had oppressed me? Or was there something deeper at work? Could it be that I helped him to fully realize his purpose? Still, as I think more and more about this man, I think I understand something about him that is deeply personal. I believe that my own need to be known—truly known and valued—reminded Jesus of his own need to be truly known. Over and over again he had given of himself, spiritually and emotionally. I had heard that his dear friend had been violently murdered. And then there were the many miracles and acts of healing, as well as being continually treated as a spectacle. By the time he arrived here he looked like a tired and broken man, just as I was a broken woman. When I challenged Jesus yet a third time, he looked directly into my eyes. For a brief, fleeting moment we shared something profound yet hard to define. I believe he realized the very thing I also had come to realize. In that brief instant Jesus saw not only my own need to be known and heard, but also his own. I needed Jesus to know my worth and he needed others to know his—beyond all the healing and miracles and things that he could do for people.4 I may have had great faith or I may have just been desperate to the point where I didn’t care about anything else except helping my daughter. My whole life had been determined by my family’s value and status—and we were viewed as having little-to-no worth. When I came to find Jesus I needed, more than ever before, to be heard. I needed someone to care about my daughter and myself. My needs and my value needed acknowledgment. Whatever really happened that day, I know that Jesus and I connected, and it wasn’t simply due to my daughter’s illness. We shared the intimate awareness of needing to be known. Nothing would ever be the same again. ∆


Questions for Discussion

1-  Imagine yourself as the mother in this story. To what lengths would you have gone to get help for your daughter?


2-  What differences might exist between the faith of a person who has been oppressed and someone who has known only privilege?


3-  Many thoughts have been proposed regarding Jesus’s response to the Canaanite/Syrophoenician woman. Why do you think that Jesus responded in the way he did to the woman’s request?


4-  Is “great faith” dictated by a person’s actions, or is it rather named and given to one by God’s own action?


Footnotes:

1 Jennie R. Ebeling, Women’s Lives in Biblical Times (London: T&T Clark, 2010), 46. Ebeling provides an in-depth look into the life of a fictional girl growing up in ancient Israel.

2 Sharon H. Ringe, “A Gentile Woman’s Story, Revisited: Rereading Mark 7.24-31” in A Feminist Companion to Mark (ed. Amy-Jill Levine with Marianne Blickenstaff; England: Sheffield Academic Press, 2001), 84-85. Ringe notes the many competing tensions, such as a mix of different ethnicities and economic statuses, evident in rural communities surrounding Tyre and Sidon in the first century C.E.

3 John J. Pilch, Healing in the New Testament: Insights from Medical and Mediterranean Anthropology (Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 2000), 76. In the Bible there is no interest in disease, as this concept was foreign. The primary interest for the ancients was identification of symptoms and to find a meaning for them. Lack of health was viewed as a socially devalued condition.

4 Barbara Brown Taylor, The Seeds of Heaven: Sermons on the Gospel of Matthew (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004), 63. Brown Taylor speaks beautifully about Jesus’s need to be known apart from all that he could do for people.

All scripture referenced from the New Revised Standard Version Bible, copyright © 1989 the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America.

Thursday, April 2, 2015

Ethics, Laws, and Religious Freedom

Last week Indiana Governor Mike Pence (R) signed into law the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). It created an immediate firestorm, not because it was a law intended to protect religious freedoms, but because many saw it as a guise for discrimination. The Republican supporters of this law claim that it is not a law of exclusivity, but one to protect the rights of everyone. The law reads:
"a person whose exercise of religion has been substantially burdened, or is likely to be substantially burdened, by a violation of this chapter may assert the violation or impending violation as a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding."1
While the law makes no mention of discrimination, it was brought to the Indiana legislature by those who have been vocally opposed to the allowance of same-sex marriage and civil unions in Indiana. Thus, many see the RFRA as a way for conservative Christians to 'refuse' service to the LGBTQ community.

As the law currently stands, a person of faith (Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist, otherwise) could be protected by Indiana law if their personal beliefs are infringed upon by the carrying out of their business services.

An example might help here. Suppose a baker doesn't want to create a cake for the wedding of a same-sex couple, due to the baker's religious beliefs being "substantially burdened." That baker could be sued by the couple for discrimination. Under this new RFRA law, the baker might find protection under the law and, thus, not get sued.

Blurry, messy ethical dilemmas.

So the real question here is this. What constitutes a person's exercise of religion to be "substantially burdened"? Baking a cake for a same-sex couple's wedding? Serving a meal to a Muslim person? Designing a brochure for a Hindu temple? Catering a meal for a mixed-race family? And if one answers 'yes' to those questions, then that person might also need to ask if they are comfortable being served by a waiter/waitress who is homosexual. They might need to ask if investing in the stock market in any way violates their religious beliefs. They might begin to examine every store they purchase clothes from (and the working conditions of the suppliers that ship those clothes to the U.S.). It is indeed a slippery slope to go down.

What also makes this slope extra slick is that the RFRA could be used in preposterous ways to foster discrimination. A restaurant owner could believe gluttony to be sinful, and therefore refuse to serve any obese customer. A pharmacy clerk could refuse to sell contraceptives...or alcohol...or any medication, for that matter. And do I dare mention health care? Could a nurse or doctor elect not to care for a person using the claim of "burdened" religious beliefs? While all of this may sound excessive, the reality is that just about anything could be found to "substantially burden" one's exercise of religion. Putting into law these types of measures feels oddly like giving permission to openly oppose and refuse service to those with whom a person disagrees. This law, in particular, seems prone to easy manipulation, allowing all forms of discrimination to be protected. Our country has come too far to allow that.

With the backlash to the RFRA law from many businesses and leaders around the country, Mike Pence and Indiana's government are now revising the law to include anti-discrimination safeguards. So though the revised law may protect against discrimination, how will these revises still allow for 'freedom of religion' in the workplace?

As a country with many different people of many different faiths and beliefs, the only way to live as a civil society is to have laws that protect against discrimination. The quandary comes in how we're able to live and to work... If I'm being asked to perform a job in a way that burdens my religious beliefs, do I have to perform that job?

There is no easy answer when it comes to religious freedom and protection of that freedom in the public sphere. Perhaps, though, tolerance and unity should prevail -- even over religious practice. Or, if one finds a particular job to be violating of their religious beliefs, the answer might be to quit that job.

Bottom line: There will always be disagreements between people over various beliefs and value systems. To allow those disagreements to determine if a person can be served by a business is to take our country down a very divisive and hate-fueled path. America has been down that path before. And it always ends with violence---which, ironically, is a violation of almost every religious belief.

1  https://iga.in.gov/legislative/2015/bills/senate/101#document-92bab197

Wednesday, November 26, 2014

Black Friday Bewilderment

I'm a bit baffled—bewildered, even—about Black Friday. I guess my confusion lies most in how I should feel about Black Friday. I am confused because I know somewhere inside that American excess is an end in itself. I know that buying more and more stuff, or even giving more and more stuff—while fun—is not always the best way to spend one's money.

Bah humbug.

No, I will not be heading out at 5 or 6 p.m. on Thanksgiving Day to begin my seasonal shopping. Nor will I rise from my slumber at 4 a.m. the next morning. I guess I just don't think the 'super' deals outweigh the chaos created by them.

Still, I do enjoy 'stuff.'

There, I've admitted it.

I admit that I'm attracted to all of those advertisements leading up to Black Friday. I'm attracted to buying DVDs for $2.00, or getting a great deal on an electronic gadget. I'm very visual, and all that stuff really fascinates me.

And it also baffles me.

It baffles me because I'm not sure how to feel about Black Friday. For small-business owners, this is a critical weekend for their livelihoods. For many others, this time of year provides needed seasonal employment. And for many, like myself, this weekend is a chance to buy some gifts for my family and friends.

I'm not sure what point I am making, except to say that I struggle with Black Friday and all that it reveals about our culture. Ultimately, I wish that I would be as willing to spend money on a World Vision catalog or a similar cause as I am on Amazon.com.

And that's where I'm at with this post-holiday holiday.

What are your feelings about Black Friday?

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Thank God A Hospital Doesn't Run Like A Church

As a seminarian, I read a lot. But not only books. Also church websites. Comparing layout and branding stuff, mostly. And when I get to the differing theologies of these various churches, I'm a little disenchanted. One local church website had an information box that read, "Are you looking for a better life? Are you looking for love, help, vision, and purpose? Know Him." Really? Better life by knowing and following Jesus? Better life by following this man who called people to leave behind everything they hold dear, to pick up their cross, and to deny themselves daily? Better life?

And then there's the whole salvation piece. Some churches lay out a basic method for the salvation of one's soul. Here's one example I found: Salvation is the free gift of God's grace and cannot be earned in any way. We receive God's grace by putting faith in Christ — making Him Lord of our lives, repenting of our sin, confessing our faith in Jesus as God, and being baptized, immersed, into Christ (which is a rather long list immediately following the phrase "cannot be earned in any way"). Other church websites put a different twist on it: We believe that there is nothing any person can do or say to "earn" God's favor or their own salvation. Our theology of mission does NOT include "winning believers for Jesus Christ" because salvation, in the Lutheran tradition, comes from God by grace, not from making a decision to accept Jesus.

And while I'm not knocking any one particular theology, I must admit the incongruity between them is discouraging.

Good thing hospitals don't work this way.

Can you imagine a world where at a hospital in Atlanta you might get treated for a common virus with a certain antibiotic (pretty ineffective for 'viruses,' anyway)—and in Charlotte you might receive a completely different medication for the same virus. Or what if a pacemaker implantation involved very specific steps at one hospital, and a completely different method at another. Preposterous as this might sound, it's exactly what churches do (and have done for thousands of years). The heart of the problem is the holy Scriptures from which Christians draw their beliefs and theologies. There are so many varying ways to interpret these Scriptures that no one group can truly claim authority.

And though inconsistent on many matters of faith, perhaps this is how it's meant to be. As author Peter Rollins has put it,
"To take our ideas of the divine and hold them as if they correspond to the reality of God is thus to construct a conceptual idol built from the materials of our mind."
So can we say anything 'true' about God?

I'm not sure we truly can.

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Continuing A Conversation In Matthew 14

A friend recently gave me a fun challenge. He wanted me to take the text from Matthew 14:22—the story of Peter walking out on the water toward Jesus—and then create dialogue to follow the famous "You of little faith, why did you doubt" line.

Here's my take on it, starting with the biblical text:

Matthew 14:22-31 nrsv

   Immediately he made the disciples get into the boat and go on ahead to the other side, while he dismissed the crowds. And after he had dismissed the crowds, he went up the mountain by himself to pray. When evening came, he was there alone, but by this time the boat, battered by the waves, was far from the land, for the wind was against them. And early in the morning he came walking toward them on the sea. But when the disciples saw him walking on the sea, they were terrified, saying, "It is a ghost!" And they cried out in fear. But immediately Jesus spoke to them and said, "Take heart, it is I; do not be afraid."
   Peter answered him, "Lord, if it is you, command me to come to you on the water." He said, "Come." So Peter got out of the boat, started walking on the water, and came toward Jesus. But when he noticed the strong wind, he became frightened, and beginning to sink, he cried out, "Lord, save me!" Jesus immediately reached out his hand and caught him, saying to him, "You of little faith, why did you doubt?"

----

   Peter responded, "Lord, I doubted because I began to sink. I was sure you wouldn't let me sink." Jesus said to him, "Did you believe you would die?" He said, "Yes, Lord, I felt as if I might die." Jesus said, "I had told you to take heart, and to not be afraid. I was telling you to trust me." Peter replied, "How was I to avoid fear with the strong wind beating on me, and then sinking into the water?" Jesus said to Peter, "Trust is born out of uncertainty." Peter responded with great frustration, "But Lord, trust is born out of a person showing themselves to be trustworthy—to have only good intentions for another."
   At this point Jesus walked Peter to the shore, and sat down with him by the tree line. "Peter, there will always be reason to doubt. A mother can prove her love for her child over and over again, but in extreme circumstances, the child will still fail to fully trust the mother. In the same way, life will throw challenges your way that will give you great anxiety. I am asking that you trust me most in those times of greatest challenge. That no matter what you may face, you will choose trust over fear, and hold fast to faith over worry." Peter then said, "Lord, how can I, as a mere man, do this?" Jesus replied, "Often, you will fail to trust me. However, the goal is to move toward trust. This will take your entire life's time. My Spirit is in you, even when you are unaware."



Sunday, May 4, 2014

Why You Should Care About This

I recently read a poem on the cover of a church newsletter that kind of ruffled my theological feathers
....
And that the name of this church has 'Grace' in its title makes their cover selection all the more of a faux pas.

Here's the poem—you may have seen it online:

No Time To Pray
by Kathryn Neff Perry

I knelt to pray but not for long,

I had too much to do.

I had to hurry and get to work

For bills would soon be due.


So I knelt and said a hurried prayer,

And jumped up off my knees.

My Christian duty was now done

My soul could rest at ease.


All day long I had no time

To spread a word of cheer.

No time to speak of Christ to friends,

They'd laugh at me I'd fear.


No time, no time, too much to do,

That was my constant cry,

No time to give to souls in need

But at last the time, the time to die.


I went before the Lord,

I came, I stood with downcast eyes.

For in his hands God held a book;

It was the book of life.


God looked into his book and said

"Your name I cannot find.

I once was going to write it down... 

But never found the time"

---

This poem, though well intentioned, is simply bad theology. Maybe this poem makes me mad because I'm a pretty progressive seminary student. Maybe it's the ignorant assumptions about God's character that tick me off. Whatever the reason, there are so many problems with this poem that it became a topic for this blog.

I also believe that you should care about this poem. If you find this poem inspiring, or challenging, or even insightful, I want to tell you why you should find it offensive.

Yes. Offensive.

This poem assumes that God is as petty as people are. It implies that salvation is dependent on 'what a person does for God,' rather than on what God has done for all people. It even says that a short prayer isn't good enough for God's standards (so watch out the next time your morning prayer is quick-and-to-the-point). It tells us that God demands certain standards of us, and that God shows no leniency when it comes to humanity's salvation.

This poem gets it all wrong, and so did the church that chose to put it on the cover of their newsletter.

God's grace is bigger than humanity's best efforts ... and also bigger than humanity's worst offenses. Period.

You should care when you see bad theology like this. Because there's likely someone who read this poem and then felt a lot of unnecessary guilt, all because they realized they weren't 'good enough.'

And to this person I say, "It's okay. Christ died because none of us are good enough."

Saturday, February 22, 2014

I Am A Christian And...

I am a Christian
and...

...I don't only listen to Christian music;
(in fact, my playlists include everyone from Johnny Cash to Slipknot)

...I don't watch only G- or PG-rated movies;
(in fact, most of my favorite movies are R-rated)

...I sometimes use 'colorful' language;
(Not often, but often to make a point)

...I don't like much of what is sold at the Christian bookstores;
(I don't like self-help Christianity or books about someone's experience of heaven)

...I lean pro-choice;
(In this world, not many issues are black-and-white)

...I'm not convinced that hell is what Christians often think it is;
(Do some biblical research and you'll see what I mean)

...I think Church should resemble something like an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting;
(Accountability, honesty, love, and support)

...I don't believe homosexuality is a sin;
(I'm friends with too many devout gay men and women to think that)

...I don't believe everything in the Bible is to be taken literally
...or that the Scriptures have been 'handed down just as God wanted them to be';
(I've studied Greek and Hebrew, and almost every verse can be interpreted two or three ways)

...I am not very faithful when it comes to reading my Bible
(And I don't think God keeps a checklist on my faithfulness)

...In the end, I do believe love wins;
(Jesus's sacrifice was big enough for all)

I am a Christian
and...
...oddly enough

...My faith isn't something I 'am,'
as much as it's something that has been done for me
on a lonely cross two-thousand years ago.

End note: The point here is simply to challenge traditional notions of what being a Christian means. It can (and should) mean different things to different people. In the end, it is really all about being loved by God ... and not about anything that we 'do.'

Saturday, January 11, 2014

Ministry Lessons From An Old Lutheran Church In Iowa

St. Paul Lutheran Church, Davenport, Iowa.

It's an older Lutheran church, founded in 1882 as the first English-speaking Lutheran congregation in Davenport. Now worshiping about 3,500 persons each week, this church is not only vital to their community, but an example of what healthy and effective ministry looks like.


I am on a two-week immersion course held at St. Paul. My classmates are other Trinity Lutheran Seminary students, and we're taking this course to further our knowledge about church life and what things make for a healthy pastor.

St. Paul's senior pastor is a man named Peter Marty. A longtime ELCA pastor who has authored multiple books and articles, Marty is a strong example of a pastor who leads by being outward focused. He cares for his parishioners, and just genuinely loves people. But he's also authentic. Whether at a staff meeting or in the pulpit, you won't see a showman or entertainer. He's just a person who tries to love God and people well.

The learning style in this class reminds me of Jesus and his disciples. We're watching Peter Marty as he does ministry. We watch and observe. And we're seeing what makes for good ministry in a suburban congregation.

There are some specific things that I'm noticing that make St. Paul a healthy, successful congregation. Oddly enough, these specific things I have noticed don't include love of God or even prayer. You'll certainly find those things at St. Paul, but you can find many, many churches that are full of people that love God and practice prayer. St. Paul Lutheran embodies some simple qualities, and does them really well. These qualities include radical hospitality, intentionality, genuine love of people, complete inclusivity, extravagant generosity, creativity, and attention to detail.


None of these qualities are new or even unique. But at St. Paul, the staff and volunteers do these things very well. They take the extra time and effort required to provide excellent ministry. We observed a staff meeting that included a time dedicated to turning to a page in the photo directory, where then each person on that page was discussed and prayed for. And I believe—I truly believe—that this discussion of parishioners was just as important as the prayer said for them. What we observed was the care of the souls who belonged to that church. This type of care requires a lot of work, and a lot of attention to detail. If Ms. Daniels hasn’t been around lately, who is going to call her or make a visit to her house? If Mr. Matthews has lost his job, will a church leader put in the time to meet with him over lunch to see how he’s doing? It takes a lot of effort and attention to detail to make a successful church. It’s not easy, nor is it supposed to be. It’s a seed of love which a church plants and God then grows.

People need—and deserve—creative leaders who care about the details of their lives. Church leaders owe it to their parishioners, and themselves, to be their creative best. St. Paul lives out these qualities. There isn't any holy magic at St. Paul in Davenport, just hard work and dedication to the work of God that they do. And it's been beautiful to watch.